Go to main contentsGo to main menu
Sunday, November 24, 2024 at 8:31 PM
Ad

Letter to the Editor

I read with interest in the August 2020 edition of Southern Living magazine that San Marcos was named among the six “smartest places to retire” in the country. I was not too surprised, as I also consider our Central Texas location ideal, our beautiful San Marcos River enchanting, and the benefits of living in a university town numerous. What occurred to me, however, was that our city doesn’t offer much for those who prefer to live close to downtown and the university, enjoying the options of walking to shop, dine out, or attend functions at the Texas State University. The sad truth is that we lack a variety of housing options for those older citizens who might investigate moving here. We currently have established neighborhoods close to the downtown area and beyond; relatively new housing developments on the outskirts of town; and a plethora of apartment complexes for university students and other young people. What we lack is the option of apartments or condominiums for retirees who might prefer a more “walkable life” in San Marcos. The developers of Lindsey Hill saw that demographic, as well as young professionals, as the most likely prospects for their development … a contribution to our fine city.

I read with interest in the August 2020 edition of Southern Living magazine that San Marcos was named among the six “smartest places to retire” in the country. I was not too surprised, as I also consider our Central Texas location ideal, our beautiful San Marcos River enchanting, and the benefits of living in a university town numerous. What occurred to me, however, was that our city doesn’t offer much for those who prefer to live close to downtown and the university, enjoying the options of walking to shop, dine out, or attend functions at the Texas State University. The sad truth is that we lack a variety of housing options for those older citizens who might investigate moving here. We currently have established neighborhoods close to the downtown area and beyond; relatively new housing developments on the outskirts of town; and a plethora of apartment complexes for university students and other young people. What we lack is the option of apartments or condominiums for retirees who might prefer a more “walkable life” in San Marcos. The developers of Lindsey Hill saw that demographic, as well as young professionals, as the most likely prospects for their development … a contribution to our fine city.

Why has it been so difficult for some of our citizens and our city leaders and staff to support such an option? I realize fear of the unknown can be consuming, as can the fear of change. But we all know the only certainty is change itself. While there seems to be no hesitation to approve endless apartment projects for students, both downtown and beyond, the refusal to offer options to older adults is stunning, baffling and disappointing.

The draw of our geographical assets and the benefits created by the University may not be enough to see us live into the prediction of being one of those smartest places to retire. Are we being smart about offering adequate options to potentially active and contributing citizens? My hope is that our decision-makers and citizens will widen their vision and be courageous enough to create a city worthy of such a group of retirees!

Dianne Pape,

San Marcos


Share
Rate

Local Savings
Around The Web